June vs. Accoil: Feature Comparison
A side-by-side comparison of features and reports in June and Accoil. Learn which differences matter based on your team’s goals — from product analytics to customer health insights.
Overview
Let’s keep this simple and honest.
This page isn’t trying to convince you that Accoil is a one-for-one replacement for June — because it’s not. June was initially built with a focus on product analytics.
Accoil comes from a different world: we’re built for Customer Success, Sales, and Support teams who want to understand usage, health, and engagement — not just analyze click count.
What follows is a clear-eyed look at how the two tools stack up, so you can make an informed decision quickly. In some cases, the difference matters. In others, it really doesn’t — it all depends on what you’re trying to do.
What's the job to be done?
Before diving into features, it’s worth asking: What’s the job to be done?
If you're looking to run product experiments, manage feature flags, conduct session replays, slice funnels, or optimize click paths — you’re looking for product analytics.
If you’re trying to understand account health, user engagement, and how usage supports growth and retention, you’re looking for customer engagement intelligence — and that’s exactly what Accoil is built for.
Feature comparison: June vs Accoil
June Feature | Accoil Equivalent | Does the Difference Matter? |
---|---|---|
Custom Dashboards | ❌ Not supported — prebuilt engagement views | Yes — if you're doing product analytics and need fine control over what’s displayed. No — if you're focused on customer engagement. Accoil shows what actually matters. |
June AI (SQL Editor) | ❌ No SQL access | Yes — if you're doing product analytics. No — If you're focused on account health and adoption, SQL shouldn't be necessary — especially for Success, Sales or Support teams. |
Audiences | ✅ Segments (users & accounts) | Yes — if you're emotionally attached to the word "audiences" (no judgment). No — segments do the same job, and Accoil gives you both user and account-level versions. |
Event Properties | ❌ Not stored | Yes — if you're slicing data for fine-grained product usage analysis. No — for understanding account health or prioritizing outreach, properties are rarely the thing that matters. |
Raw Event Feed | 🟡 Replaced with curated Insight Feed | No — raw events are interesting, sometimes, but rarely actionable. Accoil has automation alerts and feeds instead. |
Computed Properties | ❌ Not supported | Sometimes — we get that they’re useful. But for most teams, it's better to compute metrics in your own app or let tools like Segment/RudderStack handle it. |
Custom Objects | ❌ Not supported | Yes — Only if you built your system heavily around them. Most teams find users and accounts cover their needs. |
CRM Integration | ✅ Full sync + contextual widgets | No — Accoil pushes usage insights into Jira, Intercom, Zendesk, HubSpot, Salesforce, Attio, and others — so teams get context without digging. |
Shared Dashboards | 🟡 Not yet | Depends — if you're already sharing reports externally, then yes; however, please let us know what matters as we have a proof of concept already in the works. |
Alerts | ✅ Automations + Product Feed | No — Accoil replaces traditional alert noise with daily/weekly feeds and focused automations that reduce fatigue and surface only what matters. |
Report Comparison: June vs. Accoil
June shipped a lot of awesome reports. Some of them were genuinely useful. Others? Let’s just say they looked nice in a slide deck (vanity metrics).
Accoil takes a different approach: we surface signals and build segments that map directly to what Success and Growth teams need to know. While we may not wrap everything in a report format, you’ll find the same visibility — and often more actionable context — in our segments, feeds, and automations. Still, we know it's helpful to see what's covered — and what’s coming — so here's a practical breakdown of June reports and what we currently support in Accoil. No fluff. Just facts.
June Report | Accoil Equivalent |
---|---|
Activation Explorer | ✅ Yes — activation view |
New Users | ✅ Yes — via ‘✨ New users’ segment |
Power Companies | ✅ Yes — via ‘🔥 Red hot accounts’ segment |
Slipping Away Companies | ✅ Yes — via ‘❄️ Ice cold accounts’ segment |
Active Companies | ✅ Yes — via ‘All active accounts’ segment |
Power Users | ✅ Yes — via ‘🔥 Red hot’ segment |
Slipping Away Users | ✅ Yes — via ‘❄️ Ice cold’ segment |
Active Users | ✅ Yes — via ‘All active users’ segment |
Most Engaged Users & Companies | ✅ Yes — via ‘🔥 Red hot’ segments |
Sign-Up Conversion | 🟡 Depends — the activation steps are a close equivalent |
User Retention | 🟡 Not yet — on the roadmap |
Company Retention | 🟡 Not yet — on the roadmap |
Feature Audit | 🟡 No — not yet, but we like the look of it |
Feature Report | 🟡 No — not yet |
Funnel | ❌ No — not necessarily planned, tell us how you would use it |
The Explorer | ❌ No — not necessarily planned, tell us how you would use it |
Let me know if you want visual flags added for planned/coming soon or to style this into a downloadable or CMS-friendly format.
Updated about 17 hours ago